Tag Archives: Catholic Theology

Catholic Anthropology and Moral Norms v. Modern Social Questions

The following was written for my final in Moral Theology at Ohio Dominican University in Columbus OH.  It is a student’s paper and as such carries only the writer’s concepts of Catholic moral theology as can be held to a lengthy essay.  References in the body and the Works Cited are included for any who might be interested to delve further into the topic.
The fabric of the social values of Western society and of the United States of America in-particular over the course of the last several decades has played out in the political arguments and the Court systems of governments at all levels. For the United States, government-sponsored prayer was banned from public school classrooms and events beginning with Engel v. Vitale in 1962 (https://www.oyez.org/cases/1961/468), and women were granted ‘privacy rights’ to kill the children in their wombs during the first trimester in Roe v. Wade in 1972 (https://www.oyez.org/cases/1971/70-18). Lawsuits against the display of the Ten Commandments on Public (Government) properties have found mixed results. Van Orden v. Perry (Texas) in 2004 (https://www.oyez.org/cases/2004/03-1500) the Supreme Court found the display did not violate the First Amendment and the monument remained in place. McCreary County v. ACLU (https://www.oyez.org/cases/2004/03-1693) challenged the display in schools and a Court room and the Supreme Court ruled for the displays to be removed. These particular displays were considered a State sponsorship of religion, considering the surrounding scriptural documents and environment. Marriage was redefined by the Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges (https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/14-556) in June 2015, requiring all states to approve marriage between same sex couples based on the Fourteenth Amendment and equal protection under the law. These social and legal arguments indicate a deviation from Christian morality that formed the foundation for the United States’ social and legal contracts between people, based on an accepted communal commitment to biblical principles. These principles may be reviewed separately in studies pertaining to the formation of the Massachusetts Bay colony and in formations of the States of Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, and Maryland, and by a direct reading of the Declaration of Independence. Reliance on ‘their Creator’ and on ‘divine Providence’ no longer guides the decisions of social norm in these United States.
The purpose of this essay is to provide an overview of Christian anthropology as guided by the Magisterium of the Catholic Church and the moral social code given to the People through the Holy Scriptures and Tradition. First, a view of the human person is described. This is supported with scripture and works of Saints Augustine and Thomas Aquinas and the philosophical work of Saint Pope John Paul II. Next, a review of the moral codes of Catholic Christianity is explored. Analysis of the Decalogue as a foundational code and a review of the Beatitudes given in the Gospels provides the path for this exploration. Final comments espouse reocmmededations for continued conversation by Catholics in the course of their normal routines.
The Embodied Spirit
“God created mankind in his image; in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them” (Gen 1:27). “- then the Lord God formed the man out of the dust of the ground and blew into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being” (Gen 2:7). The Elowist and Yahwist priests recorded the prehistory of human creation from oral traditions handed down through the generations of the Israelite heritage. These priestly sources of the people lend the concept of the origins of man different from those of their surrounding cultures. They present the God that created Man out of love, to partner with God to care for the created world, rather than the slave or simply other creatures that roamed the earth. Saint Pope John Paul II points out from Genesis “God looked at everything He had made, and found it very good” (Gen1:31) and comments “Through these words we are led to glimpse in love the divine motive for creation, the source, as it were, from which it springs: only love, in fact, gives rise to the good and is well pleased with the good” (Saint Pope John Paul II. Man and Women He Created Them – A Theology of the Body. Michael Waldstein Ed. Boston: Pauline Books and Media, 2006. Print. p 180).
Waldstein’s notes on the Saint’s works bring out the Hebrew meaning of this creation, this image of God, unitive in nature yet both masculine and feminine; “The original text says, “God created man [hā ādām, collective noun: “humanity”?] in his image, in the image of God he created him, man [zākār, male] and woman [n qēbā, female] he created them.” (John Paul II. Man and Woman He Created Them. p 136 Note 2). Man’s complimentary nature makes possible the expressed first mission given to man to “Be fertile and multiply,” (Gen 1:28) procreative in material nature to continue in the prolific work of the evolution of creation. There is a balance in the two parts of Man for this purpose, one of the necessary elements for carrying out God’s plan.
God’s creation has both a spiritual sphere and a physical, a material sphere. “Creation takes place simultaneously, as it were, in two dimensions; The action of God-Yahweh, who creates unfolds in correlation with the process of human consciousness” (John Paul II, Man and Woman He Created Them. p 158). Spirits have conscience and freedom of will. The physical world, the world of matter is ordained to conduct itself according to the natural laws established by God for it to move and grow and evolve. Man is the intersection of these two established worlds. “Without man, spirit and matter would be two spheres, not touching; but man, belonging to one by his soul, to the other by his body, joins them together” (Sheed, Frank. Theology for Beginners. 3rd Edition. Boston: Beacon Press, 1981. Print. p 65). Man is of the matter and substance of the earth in order to be its caretaker, animated by the image of God with an integral soul breathed into it. This gives Man the ability to carry out the Genesis mandate to be fruitful, to multiply, to participate in the evolution and the caretaking of the earth, with a knowledge and tendency toward the Creator God.
The opening of this discussion brings the creation of Man to the fore, describing from Genesis the breath of God infusing life into Man. The movement of air continues through scripture as a sign of the breath of God giving life to His people. The Exodus story presents the pinning of the Israelites between the armies of Pharaoh and the Red Sea. God’s breath opens the sea for His people. “Then Moses stretched out his hand over the sea; and the Lord drove back the sea with a strong east wind all night long and turned the sea into dry ground” (Ex 14:21). God’s prophet, Elijah, prays over the dead son of his hostess, “ “Lord, my God, let the life breath return to the body of this child.” The Lord heard the prayer of Elijah, the life breath returned to the child’s body, and he lived” (1Kgs17:21,22). Again, with Elijah, on Mt. Horeb, it is not in a great storm nor fire and lightning, but “…after the fire, a light sound. When Elijah heard this he hid his face in his cloak and went out and stood at the entrance of the cave” (1Kgs19:12, 13). Elijah knew God in a ‘breath’ of air about the mountain. The work of Jesus on the night of the Resurrection caps these and many other scriptural examples of God’s breath leading to life within Man. “He said to them again, “Peace be with you. As the Father sent me, so I send you.” And when he had said this, he breathed on them and said to them “Receive the holy Spirit” (Jn 20:21, 22). Jesus, the New Adam, renews within Man the holy life of God, that Man may renew his commitment to care for the earth and all that is in it.
There is more to Man, though, than mere animation, for the breath of God animates all life in the material world. God’s breathing life into Man gives the spiritual power of discernment, an ability to perceive God and to will action toward the fulfillment of God’s plan. “Spirit is a partless, spaceless, immortal being, which can know and love” (Sheed, p 65). Where Sheed provides a simple introduction, Thomas Aquinas provides this description; “Hence it is clear that the sensitive soul has no per se operation of its own, and that every operation of the sensitive soul belongs to the composite” (Aquinas, T. Summa Theologia. Prima Partus, Q75 Art. 2; http://www.NewAdvent.org). Thomas’ commentary goes to the integral nature of the body and soul, the embodied Spirit. The active intellect processes occur, stimulate the bodily senses and these senses stimulate the passive intellect with what they receive. It is the integral nature by which Man works to interact with creation; to watch, listen, feel, hear, and taste during exploration to comprehend how creation evolves and how best to interact with it. And, this comprehension and interaction is specific to the human who senses. “…for this reason, that it is one and the same man who is conscious both that he understands, and that he senses. But one cannot sense without a body: therefore, the body must be some part of man. It follows therefore that the intellect by which Socrates understands is a part of Socrates, so that in some way it is united to the body of Socrates” (Aquinas, Summa. Prima Partus Q76 Art. 1).
The acts of the Conscience on the sensual becomes the work of the Will. Man feels hunger and the Conscience acts on the Will to locate food and consume it. Raw meat acquired is seen and the Conscience determines for the Will to heat it on a fire. A noise is heard in the surroundings and the Conscience determines what the sound represents, setting up the decision to ‘fight’ or ‘flight’. It is Man’s Conscience that collects the sense information and acts upon it. Aquinas teaches the purpose of Conscience is “…to witness, to bind, or incite, and also to accuse, torment, or rebuke” (Aquinas, Summa. Prima Partus Q79 Art 13). So, the Conscience as actor on the Will conducts the body as required. The Conscience is witness to the actions of others around its embodied Spirit. The Conscience determines how the Will shall act to make rules and laws, first for oneself and then for family, and then in concert with other families. The Conscience determines by sensual inputs whether these rules and laws are being followed, and then may determine to reinforce the self or the family with additional sensual inputs; by praise for agreeable performance, or chastisement where conformance is lacking. Perhaps the Conscience wills pain on itself or another, or intends the withholding of necessities of the spiritual or bodily life. It is the Conscience, acting on known sensual input, that wills the body into material action.

A Moral Code: Formation of the Conscience to Guide the Will
The sensual reception by the Conscience occurs in time and space. There is an historical setting of these receptions in the material world, a self-awareness of the embodied spirit in each given setting. “I cannot begin speaking, writing, acting, or thinking without beginning self-consciously and bodily” (Kavanaugh, J. Who Counts as Persons, p 32). The sense input provides the self-reference to allow the Conscience action to begin. It is this sense input that gives rise to the question of a moral code. By what principles does the Conscience make a choice when the sense input is presented? What does it mean to the Conscience to be told it may not will to pray in any given location by a heteronomous entity? How does a feminine Conscience know to act when sense input informs her she is with child? What action does the self-conscious embodied spirit allow itself to choose an activity when the moral code it has chosen as a guide is forced aside by heteronomy? Can the Conscience continue to conform when the masculine and feminine components of its own humanity are rendered irrelevant?
A first consideration in a discussion of how we learn to socialize with others is that each Conscience can order its own Will, acting autonomously according to the historical setting and sense input it receives. Man was given dominion over the earth in Genesis by God. However, an autonomous exercise of Conscience leaves Man to shape the world according to his own perceptions, his own senses, and ultimately, toward his own subjective purposes. A single person working alone finds conflict with the actions of nature and the actions of all others making their own autonomous decisions and actions. The results is a chaos not intended by the Creator. “With regard to man himself, such a concept of autonomy produces particularly baneful effects, and eventually leads to atheism:” (Saint Pope John Paul II. Veritatis Splendor. Rome: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1993. On-line #39). One person fights to gain domination of others’ actions, such that the one man’s conscience drives those of all others around him. This one man, this particular man, becomes creator for all others’ consciences.
Cohesive social interaction becomes a necessity as the social group gains in size and the number of acting Consciences increase. A second possibility in the blanket application or imposition of an external moral code with no opportunity by the individual Conscience to act. A heteronomy is a “…moral life subject to the will of something all-powerful, absolute, extraneous to man and intolerant of his freedom” (Veritatis Splendor, #41). Such an external code leaves no reason for a Conscience, nor a Will, and removes the need for the intellect. Man becomes simply another brut animal obeying the laws of nature as established at Creation and through evolution. The choice to be the Caretaker of Creation is removed, as is the choice to move towards God and the perfection of the embodied spirit Man was intended to seek.
Catholics, rather, conform to a “participated theonomy, since man’s free obedience to God’s law effectively implies that human reason and human will participate in God’s wisdom and providence” (Veritatis Splendor, #41). Reason, the act of the Conscience to order the Will according to the sense received, freely chooses that which it understands to be the will of God and the ways of God in nature and by inspiration. Reason looks to the sense input from the world and perceives within it patterns of activity, an order through which Man may carry out the duty of Caretaker of Creation toward his own end of perfected life with the Creator. These reasoned patterns are the Natural Law by which God’s moral order becomes known to Man.
It is accepted here that children learn at an amazing rate. Their entire lives are spent exploring, beginning with their own selves and extending to the world around them as they learn to mobilize themselves. Their eyes learn to focus, they ‘find’ their hands and within a matter of days begin to understand they can control their hands. Their hands and arms swing at and soon learn to grasp things in their hands. They feel these things within their grasp and soon enough begin tasting these grasped objects. They hear their mothers’ and fathers’ and siblings’ voices and come to recognize people around them by sound as well as sight. All these sense inputs are impressed on their passive intellect as abstractions until the patterns repeat themselves and the abstractions become known and recognizable forms that exist and are relied upon.
This process continues throughout life. Humans continue to learn, explore, experience, and register the environment about themselves. Things become known to ‘be’ and are known that they ‘cannot be’ anything else. The leaf is a part of a tree. It cannot be a rock. It may fall into sand and become an impression on a rock, but it is not the rock, and the rock is not leaf. Water becomes known in three forms, yet it is always the same molecular mix of elements and the conditions for it being in solid, liquid, and vaporous forms remain constants. Water cannot ‘be’ solid above thirty-two degrees Celsius, nor can it ‘be’ liquid below. It cannot be solid above one-hundred degrees Celsius. It is Man’s physical sense input that allows him to incorporate the ‘being’ of the material world. It is Man’s spiritual sense that allows him to know and understand what these material senses mean, to act consciously upon the sense input, and chose to will physical interaction with the world about himself. “It is only as a man- as a body-soul unity – that he knows things to exist, and he knows this truth as neither postulated nor demonstrated, but as evident” (Wilhelmsen, “Man’s Knowledge of Reality”, quoted in Rice, C. 50 Questions on the Natural Law. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1999. Print. 136).
These self-evident truths learned from sense impressions given to the passive intellect become points of reference of the Conscience is action. Because it is recognized that a pebble falls from a cliff when Man steps up to the edge, Man can know in his imagination that a further step will result in the same fall for himself. Man knows he should not take the next step, and should chose to walk another path to avoid the fall. Man’s development of avoiding self-injury through the initial learning process makes this a truth he knows and follows. Man knows, through his intellect, that this injury can happen to others as well, through his imagination. The injury, especially when it leads to death, will severe the relationship Man built with the other. Man knows from his initial learning that severing relationships is detrimental to his own survival. Death means separation and therefore death is an undesired consequence of any chosen action. Intentionally causing death of another becomes an understood prohibition. Hence, the forced death, the killing/murder of another becomes a violation of known truth.
Similarly, the intentional deception of one by another becomes a social prohibition. Intentional deception, the telling of a falsehood as truth confuses and can result in harm to another. A pretender to the truth that one is a person’s mother, the person known to have nurtured one through the initial stages of learning, one who was known and trusted, violates the known truth to the deceived. It harms the relationship the deceived has cultivated and believed in since birth. It is a lie. Lying becomes a violation of known truth, the killing of truth. Lying becomes a social prohibition.
Both examples, prohibitions, are learned behavior from the sense input received through the body, impressed upon the passive imagination, and become principles for guiding the Conscience held in the mind. This is an interaction of the embodied spirit of Man, the learning and recognizing the of Natural Law and the conscious choice to will and cause a physical/material action and/or reaction to the Natural Law as situations present themselves through continued sense input. These continued activities between the sensible material world and the spiritual activity provides for the building up body of experiences within Man, individually and collectively. Social contracts become the agreed upon spiritual principles for interaction in the form of traditions and rituals between the individuals and various social groups. Conformance to these social contracts are measured according to the willed actions initiated by individuals and social groups, and the rewards and punishments of the traditions.
It is the spiritual conscience activity with its intention for the spiritual will that cannot be measured or judged by observation. What is in Man’s mind is not obvious through the known senses. No social contract in the form of a man-made law can legislate persons’ thoughts nor apply punitive action against thoughts violating the social contract/law. Divine Law becomes a necessary construct for persons to monitor their interior, their spiritual activity. Aquinas provides four certain reasons for acknowledging the proper existence of Divine Law. “First, because it is by law that man is directed how to perform his proper acts in view of his last end…Secondly, on account of the uncertainty of human judgment…Thirdly, …man is not competent to judge of interior movements, that are hidden, but only of exterior acts which appear:…Fourthly, ..human law cannot punish or forbid all evil deeds:…” (Aquinas. Summa. Prima Secundae Q91 Art.4).
Man’s end, his final disposition, since he comes from God, is to return to God to share eternal happiness. Man requires Divine guidance to order his conscious and material actions towards this end. Man has the freedom of conscience to make this decision, yet still requires guideposts to know whether his activity is so ordered. Divine Law provides these guideposts. Different individuals are bound to judge their own conscious action differently based on their differing experiences of impressions on the passive intellect, and thereby forming varying principles upon which they will rely. Divine Law provides the guideposts for principles of action to hold each individual to a common principle within social activity. Again, persons cannot know the intentions of other persons’ conscious activity unless those intentions are materially expressed, either in writing, through vocalization, or by witnessed actions. It is necessary that individuals understand that their undeclared intentions will remain under scrutiny and they will be held accountable. “If he does know – in this case we are in fact dealing with knowledge that is completely interior, located with the heart and conscience – he will immediately understand when these words refer to him” (John Paul II. Man and Woman He Created Them. p 284). Aquinas’ final point reminds that a law cannot be written and transmitted that will cover every single act of conscience, will, and material action. The individual person as well as the social community in common must know internally, spiritually, that any activity violating progress toward the final end of eternal happiness results in consequences against the attainment of the same.
The Decalogue of Exodus, the Ten Commandments, coming from the oral tradition of the ancient Israelite community and written down as part of the Pentateuch becomes a transmittable form of the Divine Law. The first three of these give Man the principles of following the Divine Law Giver. There is only one God, and His Name will be honored. There will be no other gods, imagined or engraved, worshipped in place of the one God. These are both spiritual and material, bending the embodied spirit towards the Divine. The fourth is a reminder of the origin of the person, calling for honor toward one’s father and mother, the complimentary unifying love and act that produced the embodied spirit, through the unity designed by the one God for the continuation of His creation’s stewards. The fifth, sixth, and seventh laws guard the minimum material conduct of Man. Man is prohibited from killing the innocent. God gave life. Only God may remove it. Man is prohibited from misuse of the complimentary nature of the masculine and feminine. Neither may take another, but one may give oneself to another, committing to share one’s life entirely and completely toward the natural end, the eternal happiness of the other. To not do so is considered adulterous. Man is prohibited from stealing that which belongs to another. Taking what one has not gained through one’s own effort, one’s own act of conscience and will-driven material action, deprives oneself from the principled lessons needed, and deprives the other of the consequential reward of having learned such lessons. The final three commands of this baseline Divine Law speak to the spiritual side of Man. They provide boundaries for the conscience, that it avoids driving the will towards the material prohibitions. The prohibition against false speech, against lying, is against killing something of the principles truth and confuses the conscience of others and of the community. A prohibition against coveting another which is not one’s spouse provides the guidepost for the conscience against the material act of adultery. And, the prohibition against coveting another’s material goods is the guidepost against the material act of stealing. That this part of the revealed Divine Law is primarily prohibitive demonstrates the minimum level to which individuals and communities may live in harmony. They are, however, not the only revelations of Divine Law.
The Holy Scriptures are considered so because they are the written form of the revealed Divine Law over the course of human history. They repeat in many forms of literature and in many varying vocabularies the growing understanding of Man of the intentions for proper actions of the spirit and the body. Some examples are the Levitical laws of the Israelites. Leviticus chapter five provides dietary guidance, which animals are suitable for human consumption, to promote the best health of God’s people. This becomes affirmed in Daniel chapter one, where the Jews in exile in Babylon undergo a dietary experiment under King Nebuchadnezzar’s chief chamberlain. Daniel and his faithful companions show themselves as healthier than the king’s men after the ten-day test (Dn 1:12-20). Psalm 4:8,9 reveals the rest and security of the conscience for following the first three commandments. “But you have given my heart more joy than they have when grain and wine abound. In peace I will lie down and fall asleep, for you alone, Lord, make me secure.” Psalm 118:5 expresses the experience of the author for having trusted in the Divine Law. “In danger I called on the Lord; the Lord answered me and set me free.” Proverbs 8:22-36 reaffirm the faith in the story of Genesis, a faith in the creation of Man. Just two-hundred years before Christ is born, a grandson records his grandfather’s thoughts in the Wisdom of Ben Sirach. “Those who respect their father will live a long life: those who obey the Lord honor their mother” (Sir 3:6). Again, in Sirach, “He set before them knowledge, and allotted to them the law of life. An everlasting covenant he made with them, and his commandments he revealed to them” (Sir 17:11, 12). Each generation of the People of God added their experience to the body of knowledge of revelation of the Divine Law and recorded it for future generations to know.
The Messiah of the Jews, God’s Incarnation, incorporating His Divinity with the embodied spirit in the person of Jesus of Nazareth, brought to Man the revelation of the peak principles to which Man should strive. His Beatitudes of the Sermon on the Mount collected the revealed principles of the cardinal virtues. “Blessed are those who are clean of heart” (Mt 5:8) suggest a disposition toward Prudence, “…practical reason to discern our true good in every circumstance and to choose the right means of achieving it;” (Catechism of the Catholic Church. 1806). “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven” (Mt 5:3) and “Blessed are the meek,” (Mt 5:3) those who have bridled themselves to the Divine Law, showing Fortitude “…insur[ing] firmness in difficulties and constancy in the pursuit of the good” (Mt 5:5). “Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness” (Mt 5:6), “Blessed are the merciful” (Mt 5:7), and “Blessed are the peacemakers” (Mt. 5:9) bending one’s principles of mind toward Justice, disposing “…one to respect the rights of each and to establish in human relationships the harmony that promotes equity with regard to persons and to the common good” (CCC 1807). “Blessed are those who are persecuted for the sake of righteousness” (Mt 5:10), those who would show Temperance against the greed of society, “moderate[s] the attraction of pleasure[s] and provide balance in the use of created goods… ensure the will’s mastery over instincts and keeps desires within the limits of what is honorable” (CCC 1809). Through the Sermon on the mount and these simple statements, Jesus Christ challenges Man to reach of the highest of principles in the activity of the conscience, bending the will toward Man’s natural end of eternal happiness with God.

Addressing Social Issues With a Renewed Vision
Prayer is the act of the Conscience turning the will toward refreshment and renewal in the Natural and Divine Law. Allow that the spiritual Conscience is equivalent to the more ancient concept of one’s heart in human anthropology. “For me, prayer is a surge of the heart; it is a simple look turned toward heaven, it is a cry of recognition and of love, embracing both trial and joy” (St. Therese of Lisieux, Manucrits autobiogrphiques, quoted by CCC 2558). Saint Therese describes the turning of her heart, her conscience back toward the source of the Natural and the Divine Laws. Embracing both trial and joy demonstrates her commitment toward the prayer taught to Man by God directly, by Jesus in the Gospel, “…your Kingdom come, your will be done…” (Mt 6:9). Through the whole of Scripture, “I wait for the Lord, my soul waits and I hope for his word. My soul looks for the Lord more than sentinels for daybreak” (Ps 130:5,6). Turning one’s conscience to God, to the Natural and Divine Law need not violate human law. Events leading to Engle v. Vitale and subsequent Court actions did not remove the ability of the act of conscience to ‘surge toward God’ in public schools. It remains the duty of the faithful to understand the civil arguments against state-sponsored prayers in public schools in what has become a more pluralistic society. And, it remains the duty of the faithful to continue to witness within these public institutions the reason for and the practice of prayer as an acknowledgement of those Laws which we have committed our lives to.
The Supreme Court case of Griswold v. Connecticut (www.oyez.org/cases/1964/496) preceded the review of abortion rights. Griswold overturned the conviction of a Planned Parenthood counselor for giving contraceptive advice to a married couple, contrary to Connecticut law. The Supreme Court Roe v. Wade decision was based on this ‘right to privacy’ case law of Griswold. Both cases involved the reduction of the human life in the womb to an entity less than human. The question of permitting a legal allowance for abortion relies on the concept that life does not begin until the baby is born. Until then, the baby is only a matter of human tissue connected with the woman’s health. “Fidelity to human personhood, the affirmation of the intrinsic value of human persons and adherence to the truth of personal moral dignity, requires that we never reduce a human person to the condition of being a nonperson, that we not negate the personhood of ourselves or others, that we not treat a person as a mere thing or object” (Kavanaugh. Who Counts as Persons, p 119). Kavanaugh points out the flaw of the argument of the abortion supporters. This is not an argument about a woman’s privacy, nor an argument about her personal responsibility toward her health. It is an argument about the dignity of life and whether the Conscience of a society allows life to be diminished to a mere object of tissue. That life begins at the fertilization of the seed and the immediate germination of the seed is not disputed in biological science, except where those who support abortion are concerned. These arguments reject what has been discussed here, that life begins with the joining of the masculinity and femininity of Man as created by God. These arguments reject the Scriptural command to be fruitful and multiply as one principle behind the joining of the masculine and the feminine. The rejection of this fundamental Natural and Divine Law allows further the rejection of the prohibition against killing the innocent. Only through reminding individuals and by growing the numbers of faith-filled individuals knowledge in these Laws will the social contract be reverted to protecting and defending life in the womb.
“Judicial precedent has held that the right to marry is a fundamental liberty because it is inherent to the concept of individual autonomy, it protects the most intimate association between two people, it safeguards children and families by according legal recognition to building a home and raising children, and it has historically been recognized as the keystone of social order. Because there are no differences between a same-sex union and an opposite-sex union with respect to these principles, the exclusion of same-sex couples from the right to marry violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment” (“Obergefell v. Hodges.” Oyez. Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Tech, n.d. Dec 6, 2016. https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/14-556). No comment is made on biological nature of Man and the need for complimentary natures to join to create the children and families spoken of. The argument was made on the equal protection clause of human law, the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, to respect the right of any person to join with any other person to form headship for a family. The question before the Court never allowed the argument to address whether same-sex couples ‘should’ be permitted to marry for these expressed purposes, only whether they ‘should’ be permitted the equal protection of marriage laws. Dissenting opinions argued only against the jurisdiction of the Court over the question and against the creation of legislation from the Bench. The dissenters, three of them Roman Catholics, never brought into the argument the natural complimentary nature of Man nor the social statistics of the government and private organizations that rally support for the need of both a father’s and a mother’s presence in a family for the utmost care and raising of the children. The argument presented from both sides demonstrates a complete divorce of the social conscience from Natural and Divine Law.
The arguments also demonstrate Aquinas’ forth reason of accepting the need for Divine Law. Every condition or question of the endeavors of Man cannot be legislated. The question of marriage between same sex partners is not a known issue of law in civilizations until the latter half of the twentieth century. The activity of homosexuals is well documented in history, notably in the artwork revealed in the excavations of Pompeii Italy and documented in Roman law. That these activities are prohibited in the Abrahamic religious Scriptures demonstrate the concern for violation of the complimentary nature of man for the past thirty-two-hundred years. Perhaps the most telling modern event concerning the quesion is the rejection of the Freudian supported diagnosis of homosexuality as a physiological disorder by those who lobby for the ‘naturalness’ of the practice, in the face of a social order built largely upon Freud’s psychoanalytic theories. This rejection is no ‘Freudian slip’.
The myth-history of Genesis describes an original solitude of Man, according to Saint Pope John Paul II, a solitude that would not stand the test of time. God brought all the animals to man to be named, but none was found to be a suitable companion for Man. “So the Lord God cast a deep sleep on the man, and while he was asleep he took out one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh. The Lord God then built…the woman.” (Gen 2:21-23). Putting Man into a deep sleep, a dreamless form, God makes Man into a complimentary being. “…the meaning of original unity;…based on masculinity and femininity, which are, as it were, two different “incarnations,” that is, two ways in which the same human being, created “in the image of God” (Gen 1:27), “is a body””(John Paul II. Man and Woman He Created Them, p 157). This form permits God to bless Man with the care of Creation, to make Man, His creation of embodied spirit, steward over all, to be fruitful in Man’s own work, to multiply and fill the earth. It is this understanding of human anthropology that is lost in present discussions concerning the meaning of marriage and the purpose of the complimentary nature of Man. It is this Christian understanding of human anthropology that should become a primary subject in continuing catechesis for the foreseeable future if there is to be any expectation of changing the social conscience on the matter of the complementary component of marriage.
The final point of discussion are the material displays of the Ten commandments and what they mean to different people and social organizations. The ACLU and atheist groups argue these displays are government promotion of specific religions. The common view of these laws are as restrictions on the freedom of the actions of conscience. Few would argue that stealing and murder should be unrestricted in society. Honoring fathers and mothers with proliferation of broken homes and mixed families prevalent in a society with a divorce rate greater than fifty per-cent may often be a difficult argument. However, it is the very real difficulty of these circumstances for which the Commandment was written to avoid. Sexual pleasure remains a multi-million dollar industry and restricting sexual promiscuity directly or the advertisement of the same runs into Courts’ decisions upholding the ‘free speech’ of those in the business. Keeping up with the Joneses by coveting what they have and working to acquire what ‘they’ have is a common axiom in capitalist society.
Never is there a Court argument that these excesses would be curbed by the continuous review of the Decalogue. Prominent display of these ancient social contracts would permit such a constant review by those closely associated with the locations. A stronger message and more broadly applied is the conversation and example of those adhering to these commandments and when queried, espousing the values of them as minimum social constructs for actions of conscience, direction of the will, toward material actions of temperance in a society demonstrating a lack thereof. This is the fundamental witness Catholics need to live to support a growing social commitment to these ancient and still valuable statements of Divine Law.

Works Cited
Aquinas, T. Summa Theologia. 2nd Revised Ed; Trans. Fathers of the English Dominican               Province, 1920. On-line at NewAdvent.org © 2016 Kevin Knight.
Catechism of the Catholic Church. Rome: Libreia Editrice Vaticana. Washington D.C.:                   United States Catholic Conference, 1997. Print.
Kavanaugh, John. Who Counts as Persons Human Identity and the Ethics of Killing.                       Washington: Georgetown UP, 2001. Print.
Body Politic. Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago-Kent College of Law, 2016.                             https://oyez.org on-line.
Rice, C. 50 Questions on the Natural Law. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1999. Print.
Senior, Donald, John Collins, Mary Ann Getty Eds. The Catholic Study Bible. 3rd Ed.; New              York: Oxford UP, 2010. Print.
Saint Pope John Paul II. Man and Women He Created Them – A Theology of the Body.                      Michael Waldstein Ed; Boston: Pauline Books and Media, 2006. Print.
Saint Pope John Paul II. Veritatis Splendor. Rome: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1993. On-line.
Sheed, Frank. Theology for Beginners. 3rd Edition. Boston: Beacon Press, 1981. Print.

Advertisements

What Do You Believe?

It is a question I asked my children often when they were in high school and for a few years after.  I still ask them once or twice a year, and when they ask me for advice (not often, but when they ask) the question above is always the opening query.  Philosophy, for the little our education system teaches these days, is still the foundation for making sound decisions, and it is important for each person to remember what their own foundation is periodically.  Some call it ‘centering’.  I prefer ‘foundation’.  One builds character on some foundation.

Consider the children’s story of the Three Little Pigs.  Has your mind already jumped ahead to which of them had the stronger foundation of faith or belief to last out life’s storms?  Do you already know who or what your own ‘Big Bad Wolf’ is?  This simple childhood story represents Western philosophy education at its basic level and typically in the home.  Then, there’s the popular culture book “All I Ever Needed to Know I Learned in Kindergarten”. What is taught in education today?  A myriad of concepts come to mind and to discuss them would veer off my intent here.  What is relevant is that each of us finds some level of commitment to some principle of life, and we move forward with our lives.  Few venture beyond what was learned in middle school or high school, testing what they believe in their forays into their work or through their college years and beyond.

For all the years I asked the question of my children my point was to know what they chose to hold true from what their mother and I taught them, and what they picked up along the way on their own to strengthen or replace those lessons.  It remains a question they don’t like answering,…yet.  One day, I hope the example with have their own children squirming in a chair.  This is not some sadistic plot but an effort to get them ready for their own ‘Big Bad Wolves’.

For all the asking of what they believe, they have never turned the question back on me.  I can’t say why because it would be speculative, and that is always a mistake when building friendships.  However, I have been doing some reading about how to continue to build this friendship with my children I am prompted by the author to answer the question posed for myself.  In all my fifty-seven years, no one has ever asked me. I’ve been studying theology at the Master’s level for three years, and the question hasn’t come up there either.  I’m certain my actions have demonstrated for those around me, especially my children, what I believe.  The deeper answer is why?

“Why am I Catholic?”

Simple answer is, I believe. Sure, I was born and raised, schooled through grammar school. But I joined the Navy, for crying out loud, and stayed 20 years. With all I’ve seen, why ‘stay’ Catholic?

Because, for all I’ve seen, it is True, and the Church remains a repository of Truth, and that Truth is carried to every corner of society, every day of the year. The reason the Catholic social networks are as strong as they are is because the embodied spirits of the people let the life of Christ shine through in what they do, some a little, some a lot, and some in everything they do.  Catholic health care makes up one sixth of the healthcare economy in the U.S.  Catholic Charities is the largest relief organization in the world.  The Catholic school system, from grammar school through high school, and into post secondary education, is the largest private school system in the world.  These are the works of the Church that come from the faith.

What the public hears more of, though, are the sins of the Church.  Of course, it’s what we expect.  Two-percent of our priests have committed unspeakable acts in the past several decades.  Movies portray these same servants in poor light since the 1960’s.  Long forgotten is Pat O’Brian’s portrayal of Father Flanagan, founder of Boy’s Town in the 1940’s.  The Exorcist was a pop-culture phenomenon and now a ‘new’ fall drama on a major TV network.  Charlton Heston’s Moses in the 1956 Ten Commandments is now dependent on implied illusions of a child messenger because of Christian Bale’s bump on the head, a far more earthly portrayal of the myth-history.  The modern stories of Saint Pope John Paul II and Saint Mother Theresa of Calcutta can hardly keep up with the world’s reminders of our real sins and culture’s distortion of both our work and our theology.  Zombies and vampires are somehow more believable than God becoming man and sharing our embodied spirit existence here on earth.

I still choose to believe.  I continue to be inspired by the Spirit.  I continue to hold that when I attend Mass I am at an intersection of this material world and the spiritual heaven. And in receiving what appears to many as only bread and wine, I affirm that it is the Body and Blood of the Lamb of God as described in the Gospels.  It is both an act of Faith  and an act of Will of my Conscience.

If you ask yourself the title question, what answer do you come up with?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conjugal Love

This paper is not about the arguments over what is now legal marriage in the United States and much of Western society.  Some of you are aware that I have been working and writing to promote the Catholic orthodox Truths about what marriage is these past several years.  I am aware that most of you do not hold to those beliefs as Truth but as Choice.

This paper is a short exploration of married love, beyond the Affections and Friendships where they start and past the eros of the conjugal act toward the practice of Charity.  My hope is that you will find in the essay a new or consolidated awareness about Catholic Church teaching and find in it some affirmation of your own experiences and a continuing curiosity towards the reason and Truth of marriage.
Peace of Christ be with you all.

Conjugal Love

A combination of the two words in the title creates a connotation both definitive and confusing. “Conjugal” takes on the descriptive according to the dictionary as “MARITAL, matrimonial, nuptial, marriage, bridal; Law spousal;” (Oxford American Writer’s Thesaurus, Christine A. Lindburg, Comp. p. 170) and “love” has so many variations it takes up an entire page in the same book. The project within these pages is to attempt to propose one brief view of conjugal love. This essay will define conjugal love and present some ways in which it may be built between a man and a woman. Though commitment to conjugal love is vocalized at the beginning of a marriage, true commitment will be shown to be demonstrated as the marriage progresses. A discussion of how conjugal love may be challenged and preserved throughout its duration is presented before summarizing the ultimate ends intended.

Defining Conjugal Love

“[M]arriage is a school of love” (Grace, Drs. Mike and Joyce. A Joyful Meeting – Sexuality in Marriage, p. 2). The Graces open their discussion of sexuality in marriage with a statement that gives some temporal reference to conjugal love. Marriage is a ‘school’ and ‘school’ takes time. Primary and secondary schooling in our culture takes the better part of twelve years and longer when college is added. Conjugal love is a long-term commitment to learning, then, and as noted already, learning about “love” in marriage

C.S. Lewis provides an opportunity to be more concise in defining love in his book The Four Loves An Exploration on the Nature of Love. Lewis suggests our intentions for the word ‘love’ be divided into four categories using the words Affection, Friendship, Eros, and Charity. Affection and Friendship may lead to Eros, or conjugal love, and Eros may and should lead a couple to charitable love. Lewis acknowledges that Eros, known to the Greeks as a worship of sexuality, may include aspects of sexual activity, and the idea is accepted in this essay as well. More importantly,   “Eros wants the Beloved” (Lewis, C.S. The Four Loves An Exploration of the Nature of Love, p. 95). The love Lewis describes continues beyond, in the absence of, and in spite of sexual desires. It exists in the heart of one spouse for the good of the other, wanting that good for the other in all circumstances. Three aspects of conjugal love are revealed thus far. They are a long-term commitment, involving sexual intimacy, for the good of the other. Conjugal love moves beyond the casual and fleeting interests of Affection. Unlike Friendship in which the two would face toward a common interest, Conjugal Love has the two focused on the other. The Graces point out that conjugal love and the conjugal act have a “special character” compared to these other loves (Grace, Mike and Joyce, p. 2)

Joseph Martos approaches this special character of love in this manner in his description of the Catholic sacrament of marriage; “…conjugal love […] requires indissolubility, fidelity and openness to fertility: an indissoluble union is the only appropriate relationship for sexual activity, and openness to fertility […] conforms to the natural order as intended by God. The Christian family thus becomes a “domestic church” in which parents and children exercise the priesthood of the baptized in a special way… …for the sake of the kingdom”( Martos, Joseph. Doors to the Sacred – A Historical Introduction to Sacraments in the Catholic Church, p. 391). Martos captures three of four considerations for the Church’s view of sacramental marriage; fidelity, fertility (fruitfulness), and the indissoluble union (forever). The fourth is presented here in the vows taken by the couple; “Have you come here freely and without reservation to give yourselves to each other in marriage?” (Champlin, Joseph M. and Peter A. Jarret. Together for Life, p. 86). “At the heart of the act establishing marriage, is a free, self-determining choice on the part of the man and the woman to give themselves a new and lasting identity”( May, William. Marriage: The Rock on Which the Family is Built, p. 4).

The concept developed is summarized in the Catechism of the Catholic Church; “[t]he matrimonial covenant, by which a man and a woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life, is by its nature ordered toward the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring; this covenant between baptized persons has been raised by Christ the Lord to the dignity of a sacrament” (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1601). “Conjugal love, as we have seen, is a love that is not only human, total, faithful and exclusive until death, but fertile. Conjugal love is procreative in nature” (May, p. 14). C.S. Lewis may punctuate this with “In it (Eros) there is a real nearness to God (by Resemblance); but not necessarily a nearness of Approach. Eros… may become a means of approach.” (Lewis, pp. 109, 110).

Building Conjugal Love

The building of conjugal love begins before the wedding. J.R.R. Tolkien describes the romantic evolution in Western culture in a letter to his son Michael. “It idealizes ‘love’ and as far as it goes can be very good, since it takes in far more than physical pleasure, and enjoins if not purity, at least fidelity, and so self-denial, ‘service, courtesy, honour, and courage” (Tolkien, John. R. R., The Letters of JRR Tolkien, pp 48, 49). It surely begins with Lewis’ Affection, may include some element of Friendship, and certainly, at some point, determines to become exclusively oriented toward one specific other.

The nuptial blessing of the Catholic ceremony blesses this beginning, and looks forward to the future. “Lord, may they both praise you when they are happy and turn to you in their sorrows. May they be glad that you help them in their work and know that you are with them in their need. May they pray to you in the community of the Church, and be your witnesses in the world. May they reach old age in the company of their friends, and come at last to the kingdom of heaven. We ask this through Christ our Lord. Amen” (Catholic Rites Today Abridged Texts for Students, p. 441). The blessing promises both good times and bad, work as God promised “in the garden of Eden, to cultivate and care for it” (Gen 1:15) before the Fall, a community to work with and be supportive of their conjugal love, and a commission to witness as one to those they meet on their journey.

‘The good of the spouses’ requires a refinement of the Affection and the Friendship that brought them together. “…in marriage, we must try to combine a psychological “love-friendship” relationship with an older (in the evolutionary sense) biological “mate” relationship.” (Grace, Mike and Joyce, p. 2) Ideally, this begins after the commitment is publicly professed for the conjugal act confirms the commitment voiced in the open, the giving of oneself to the other. “The fruitfulness of conjugal love extends to the fruits of the moral, spiritual, and supernatural life that parent hand on to their children by education” (CCC 1653). Joining in the complementarity of intercourse, the man and woman become enveloped in the Divine spark of creation. Their joining, their participation in this Divine creativity, becomes the source of their sustaining conjugal creativity in living their faithful and permanent life as one. It must permeate their daily routines, feed their individual and combined labors that provide for home and hearth and the teaching of those children added to their union. “…what makes for unity is common action: activity toward common ends. Two things are parts of a greater whole- are one– if they act as one; and they act as one if they coordinate toward one end that encompasses them both”(Girgis, Anderson, &George , p. 25)

Committing to Conjugal Love

“Can we be in this selfless liberation for a lifetime? Hardly for a week. Between the best possible lovers this high condition is intermittent” (Lewis, p. 114). Lewis tells no lie. He calls attention to the reality of life. The ‘honey moon’ will end. The man and woman will come down from the loftiness of the romance. “Welcome to the real world of marriage, where hairs are always on the sink and little white spots cover the mirror, where discussions center not on “where should we eat tonight?” but “why didn’t you get milk? It is a world where bills and in-laws and jobs and children all clamor for our attention…” (Chapman, Gary. The 5 love Languages The Secret to Love That Lasts, p. 31). Now the real impact of the commitment begins.

“We must do the works of Eros when Eros is not present. This all good lovers know…” (Lewis, p. 115). The man and women were drawn together, by instinct and by the Spirit. They looked each into the others’ eyes and saw only the other, to the exclusion of all others. They stood before their God and professed a life-long commitment. No amount of observation, no countless conversations with a confraternity of wedded couples could prepare them. Only now, after the haze of the romance is gone does the real work of conjugal love begin. Conjugal love emerges in “the growth and maturing of the spouses as persons, through the aids, comforts, and consolations, but also through the demands and hardships, of conjugal life, when lived according to God’s plan. The full view of the scope and content of the “good of the spouses” emerges when we recall that the spouses are called to eternal life, which is the one definitive bonum of the spouses” (Kimengich, Dominic. The Bonum Coniugum: A Canonical Appraisal. Rome: Pontificiu Athenaeum Santae Crocis, 1997 p. 204. Quoted by May, p. 24)

Though Lewis’ comment enjoins us to reality, the reality may rise and fall with the complementarity of the Conjugal act. Joining physically, emotionally, and within the religious context, spiritually, in three planes of existence the ‘two become one’ in an embrace that begins a third life. It is the greatest act of creativity we possess as humans, the pinnacle of the Divine spark we are granted from Genesis. What God created from dust we mingle to continue to bring forth others who will join Him and us in being tenders of the world we are charged with.

This third life becomes the ribs of the marriage, connected to and strengthening the keel of the vessel with is the indissoluble vows professed at the beginning of the marriage. This addition and every other addition of life to the marriage requires the continued commitment of tending, building, and shaping. A ship does not sail with keel and ribs alone. It requires planks, sealing out the ocean, erecting masts, nailing decks, hanking on sails and the lines to control them. So it follows that the marriage union and the lives generated within it require the planking of survival skills, the deck plates of education upon which to grow a stable life, the inspiration of sails to pull one forward, and the lines of principle to steer the desired course. These are the continuing efforts required of husband and wife becoming parents; to raise the children their love has generated, to become interdependent human beings that will also engage in life-long commitments with continuing fruitful results. “Discussing responsible parenthood in relation to Humanae Vitae he [Pope Paul VI] writes the following; “…the Council teaches: “Thus they will fulfill their task with human and Christian responsibility, and with docile reverence toward God.” This means that they “will make decisions by common counsel and effort” (Pope St. John Paul II. Man and Woman He Created Them A Theology of the Body, 121-2 p. 626)

Preserving Conjugal Love

“Pair-bonding reinforces fidelity. […] And being both mates and parents together gives married love a down-to-earth quality that is healthy. The challenges we face here test our love realistically; they don’t allow us to live in a world of sentimental daydreams and illusions” (Grace, Mike and Joyce, p. 3). The couple are pulled in many directions and often pulled in separate directions. The core ideal in the beginning was to grow together and be as one. “…what makes for unity is common action: activity toward common ends. Two things are parts of a greater whole- are one– if they act as one; and they act as one if they coordinate toward one end that encompasses them both” (Girgis, Anderson, & George, p. 25). Yet individual concerns for careers, decisions about how to handle children’s issues, financial and wealth management methods, and, yes, the concerns of the in-laws all play their parts in pulling on the commitment of conjugal love. More often than not, in our culture, the two are pulled apart. They forget the language of their romance, their Affection, their Friendship. They begin to fall away from conjugal love.

How can we speak each other’s love language when we are full of hurt, anger, and resentment over past failures? The answer to that question lies in the essential nature of our humanity. We are creatures of choice.” “…we can say, “I’m sorry.” (Chapman, p. 131) “ And all good Christian lovers know that this programme, modest as it sounds, will not be carried out except by humility, charity, and divine grace; that it is indeed the whole Christian life seen from one particular angle” (Lewis, p. 115). “Let them thoughtfully take into account both their own welfare and that of their children, those already born and those which the future may bring. For this accounting they need to reckon with both the material and the spiritual conditions of the time as well as of their state in life. Finally, they should consult the interests of the family group, of temporal society, and of the Church herself” (Pope St. John Paul II, 121-2 p. 626)

Dr. Ed Wheat wrote of the challenges of conjugal love when only one partner is willing. Emotions must be kept in check. This work must be accomplished in the head and in the heart, not on the sleeves. “Undisciplined feelings can cause a crash unless one keeps himself stabilized by the facts of the word of God. […] With daily practice, one learns not to panic but to believe a specific truth (Wheat, Ed. How to Save Your Marriage Alone, p. 17). That truth is conjugal love is meant to last a lifetime.

Sharing Conjugal Love

St. John Paul II reminds us of the nuptial blessing received. The two are part of and supported by a community of believers, a community that is Church. “We see these very conflicts (between husband and wife) as gifts from the Father, designed to help us grow in love and faith, designed to help prepares us for union with Him” (Grace, Mike and Joyce, Preface p. ix). The two were joined as one, yet the one is part of many. Moreover “so we, though many, are one body in Christ, and individually parts of one another. Since we have gifts that differ according to the grace given to us, let us exercise them:” (Rom 12:5, 6) The ‘one body’ of the married in conjugal love has available the skills and blessings of the community.

“In the security of love, a couple can discuss differences without condemnation. Conflicts can be resolved. Two people who are different can learn to live together in harmony. We discover how to bring out the best in each other. Those are the rewards of love.” (Chapman, Gary, p. 143). Those are the rewards of strength through humility, the ability to continue to serve that ‘other’, to refocus as one did when Affection and Friendship turned to Eros. “The essence of love is an act of the will. Feelings come and go in marriage. Those with happy marriages are those who choose – choose to love their [other] more than themselves…” (Guzman, Sam. Rev. of “Tolkien Speaks: The Secret to a Happy Marriage”). “God promises me that He will teach me how to love you as you should be loved” (Wheat, p. 23).

“”Out of reverence for Christ, […] each spouse realizes that his or her life is no longer about himself or herself. In the love that the share they are called to a life of mutual submission out of reverence for Christ, who submitted himself to the Paschal Mystery out of love for his bride [the Church]. Thus the “family that Christian spouses are called to form becomes an apt acronym for, “Forget About Me, I Love You” (Cahall, p. 346, 347)

Over and again, through the school of love these lessons are learned and re-learned. Sacrifice by each of the two are offered for the sake of the one. The conjugal act remains a sign of the healing. It is in returning to the marriage bed that the two-joined-as-one continue to touch and draw on the Divine spark of creativity, even beyond the years where fertility has left them and the physical joining less intense. More intense is the emotional renewal and the reception of Divine grace of the meeting. The continued rendezvous in the marriage bed strengthens the unity of the two through the Divine and moves them towards that love which is Charity. The one couple’s conjugal love becomes their shield and their source of Divine energy to meet the challenges of the external world with renewed strength and Spirit. Through prayer, commitment, and the counsel of the Church community, one life is lead, raising and educating children until they are prepared for their own vocation and the good of the couple carries the one forward toward conjugal charity.

Towards Conjugal Charity

“…what makes for unity is common action: activity toward common ends. Two things are parts of a greater whole- are one– if they act as one; and they act as one if they coordinate toward one end that encompasses them both.” (Girgis, Anderson, &George, p. 25, italics mine). Because ‘action’ demonstrates commitment this quote is repeated with emphasis. What began as a man’s and a woman’s action of choosing Affection for each other and grew into an Eros where the action of each could only be directed toward the other was the beginning of a journey towards agape’ love, Charity according to Lewis. Only through the act of total submission of each to the other will they truly become one and reflect Love Himself. “And this need not surprise us, for the Author of both is the same. As Christ is perfect God and perfect Man, the natural loves are called to become perfect Charity and also perfect natural loves” (Lewis pp. 133, 134).

Conjugal Charity is the natural goal of conjugal love. The ‘one’ pours itself out for the life of the community. “…Christian couples are entrusted with the tremendous responsibility of preserving the meaning and significance of their conjugal expression of love as a revelation of God’s own fruitful love” (Schumacher, Michele M. “An Inseparable Connection: The Fruitfulness of Conjugal Love and the Divine Norm, Nove et vetera 1.2, p. 386).

Conjugal love is an act of will freely subordinating personal desires to the joint actions with another and for the good of that other, to produce children through the conjugal act. Conjugal love is the act of participation in and practice of Divine creativity. It is a life-long commitment to continually grow together and act as one, for the good of the children-gifts and the good of the greater community of the Church. It is freely given, faithfully exercised, fruitful in progeny and action for the domestic and greater Church and it is for the life of the two-become-one, looking toward the participation in Divine love.
Works Cited

Cahall, Perry J. “The Mystery of Marriage A Theology of the Body and the Sacrament” Chicago: HllenbrandBooks, unpublished manuscript. Print.

Catholic Rites Today Abridged Texts for Students. Allan Bouley, Ed. Collegeville: The Order of St. Benedict, Inc., 1992. Print. .

Champlin, Joseph M. and Peter A. Jarret. Together for Life. Notre Dame: Ave Maria Press, 2012. Print.

Chapman, Gary. The 5 love Languages The Secret to Love That Lasts. 1992. Chicago: Northfield Publishing, 2015. Print.

Catechism of the Catholic Church. Vaticana: Libreria Editrice, 1994. English translation Washington D.C.; United States Catholic Conference, 1994. Print.

Girgis, Sheif, Ryan T. Anderson, and Robert P. George. What is Marriage? Man and Woman: A Defense. New York: Encounter Books, 2012. Print.

Grace, Drs. Mike and Joyce. A Joyful Meeting – Sexuality in Marriage. St. Paul: International Marriage Encounter, 1980. Print

Guzman, Sam. Rev. of “Tolkien Speaks: The Secret to a Happy Marriage”. The Catholic Gentleman. http://www.catholicgentleman.net. July 13, 2015. Web. Accessed July 20, 2015.

Lewis, C[live] S[taples]. The Four Loves An Exploration of the Nature of Love. New York: First Mariner Books, 2012.

Martos, Joseph. Doors to the Sacred – A Historical Introduction to Sacraments in the Catholic Church. 1981. Ligouri: Ligouri Triumph, 2001. Print.

May, William. Marriage: The Rock on Which the Family is Built. 1995. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2009. Print.

Oxford American Writer’s Thesaurus, Christine A. Lindburg, Comp. New York: Oxford U.P., 2004. Print.

Pope St. John Paul II. Man and Woman He Created Them A Theology of the Body. 1986. Michael Waldstein, Trans. & Ed. Boston: Pauline Books and Media, 2006. Print.

Schumacher, Michele M. “An Inseparable Connection: The Fruitfulness of Conjugal Love and the Divine Norm.” Nove et vetera 1.2 (2003): 381 – 402. Print via OhioLINK & LVIS.

Senior, D. GenEd. The Catholic Study Bible. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990. Print.

Tolkien, J[ohn]. R[onald]. R[euel]. The Letters of JRR Tolkien. 1981. Humphry Carpenter, Ed. New York: Houghlin, Mifflin, Harcourt. 2000. Print

Wheat, Ed. “How to Save Your Marriage Alone”. Nashville; Zondervan Harper Collins Christian, 1983. Print.